This is a "restart" post following hearing on Wed 15 May refusing recusal of ICC Judge, and correspondence received from JCIO on 17 May
Please note there is no suggestion of impropriety against the ICC Judge who eventually heard the case on 15 May. The appeal relates to the principle of recusal that was, I say, misapplied.
Guidance issued to Judges:
https://www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/guide-to-judicial-conduct-revised-july-2023/
and the full document at:
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Guide-to-Judicial-Conduct-2023.pdf
.....................................................
My complaint to JCIO and SRA placed in evidence in open court on 15 May [CR-2023-004001 Hardy v Buchler et al] with ORAL request for recusal
https://app.box.com/s/39m9px1gdn5ctsz74f6qyw0kbit3vq1q
See further document links below.
REQUEST DENIED - LEAVE TO APPEAL REFUSED
Application for Leave to Appeal is being CE-filed.
Application for Leapfrog Appeal to Supreme Court is being CE-Filed.
EMail from ICC Court 6 days earlier
Dear Sirs,
Please be advised that the hearing will be conducted in person before Dr Baister sitting as a Deputy ICC Judge. Judge Baister has requested a Hard hearing bundle be lodged with no less than 2 days before the hearing.
Regards,
REDACTEDICC Judge’s Clerk
Insolvency and Companies Court
The Business and Property Courts of England & Wales | HMCTS | 7 Rolls Building, Fetter Lane | London | EC4A 1NL
Phone: REDACTED
..............................................................
Further/Supporting documents:
Evidence attached to JCIO and SRA complaint:
https://app.box.com/shared/static/xz7c2j31da8pxsanr096lp7j2u4w0vno.pdf
........................................
NB: THE STATEMENTS GIVING RISE TO THE IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE WERE MADE ON 8 DECEMBER 2022 AND WERE VIDEO RECORDED BY THE CONFERENCE ORGANISERS AS THEY STATED DURING THE CONFERENCE
(Anyone care to run a book on the recording/evidence having has been destroyed?)
Comments
Post a Comment